SEC fine on ERI; Easy way out?
Sri Lanka’s Securities & Exchange Commission  (SEC) has been accused of being ‘soft’ on Environmental Resources  Investments (ERI) after the latter was imposed a fine of Rs 10 million  for offences related to trading issues.
 “The irony however is that it  seems every time high profile persons get caught for fraudulent activity  the SEC seem to cut deals with them to leave them out of jail in return  for insignificant fines by compounding their cases,” said Harsha de  Silva, economist and opposition UNP parliamentarian in a statement  following reports that the SEC was finally taking action against the  high-profile company.
 Dr de Silva’s statement to the media, said:
“We understand that the SEC is planning to compound undisclosed securities fraud by some billionaire investors. Media reports have begun to circulate that Environmental Resources Investments (ERI) and its Directors have agreed with the SEC to pay an insignificant fine of Rs 10 million and compound an offence related to securities trading. While the nature of the fraud has not been made public it was well known that the SEC was investigating ERI for trading and disclosure related matters.
 While the SEC is yet to make  an announcement on this matter and acknowledging that this statement is  based on media reports we nevertheless believe it is the SEC’s duty, as  the regulator, to take swift action against fraudulent activities under  the SEC Act.  The Act calls for prosecution. If ERI has not committed  any fraud they will be found not guilty but if convicted the  perpetrators shall be imprisoned and fined accordingly. 
 The reason for tough action is  to discourage white-collar crime. Why US prosecutors are seeking a near  25-year sentence for Raj Rajaratnam is to drive home this point.  However the cancer of insider dealing, front-running and money  laundering that is going on at the Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE) is well  known but nothing is being done about it. For instance, while the  conflicts of interests with the Central Bank using Employees Provident  Fund (EPF) to trade in shares of commercial banks have been pointed out  on numerous occasions and shown to violate its own code of conduct for  investments in the CSE, the Central Bank continues to buy and sell  shares of almost all commercial banks. 
 When the SEC keeps silent it  sends the wrong message on white-collar crime at the CSE and destroys  the confidence among bona fide investors.  The status quo does not augur  well for the CSE or the economy in the long run. This is particularly  so when Sri Lanka is looking for large scale private investments to  sustain the post-war development effort. 
 With respect to ERI, it is  known that ERI was under the watch of the investing public and analysts  for quite some time for its transactions with hardly any solid  information to substantiate its various claims. The unprecedented and  sudden rise of its share price from Rs 28 to Rs 275 based inter alia on  news of purchasing a company purportedly with access to platinum assets  and the subsequent outflow of some $18 million to the British Virgin  Islands as part payment had been under constant query by market  watchers.  It has now been revealed that the shares of the said company;  ERL, ironically sounding almost similar to ERI, has been sold to a  company whose ultimate owner is the same entity that ERI originally  purchased the shares from.  In this background allegations of money  laundering and market manipulation continue to be rife. 
 Paradoxically, ERI, boasting  of mega profits from global and local investments have just filed a  consolidated loss of Rs 23 million for the quarter ending 30 June 2011  as opposed to Rs 418 million profits for the year ending 31 March 2011. 
 Market watchers have also  levelled allegations of overseas criminal convictions on at least one of  the Directors of ERI. Allegations of non-disclosure of related party  transactions have been made on at least two Directors with regard to a  company by the name of Knight Trade that happens to be the second  largest shareholder of ERI which is owned by a company named Yenom which  coincidentally is owned by the said two Directors of ERI. Questions  have been raised if this company has the authority to use the official  'Lion' logo of Sri Lanka.  It is further alleged that ERI uses the  identical logo for a stock broking company in Sri Lanka named ‘DNH  Financial Private Limited’ and for a company named ‘DNQ Financial  Private Limited’ based in Dubai to confuse investors and undertake  deceptive transactions. 
 In an almost unbelievable  development, as per the official bid book, ERI had agreed to build the  2018 Hambantota Commonwealth Games Village along with Sri Lanka  Insurance Corporation and become the largest private sector investor of  the Games while the SEC was investigating the company for alleged  securities fraud and or disclosure offences. This almost seems like  buying oneself out of trouble and most certainly a conflict of interest. 
 Given there is no information  forthcoming from authorities it is anyone's guess as to the validity of  these allegations. Therefore, as a responsible opposition safeguarding  the interests of the public and the nation it is our duty to call for  action to either prosecute or clear the persons involved.  Having seen  the fallout of scandals like Golden Key where innocent middle class  families lost all their savings it is a matter of serious concern that  repetitions are avoided. 
 In this background the SEC  cannot any longer afford to turn a blind eye to the allegations at the  CSE.  It is certainly detrimental to the country's development drive.  The SEC must act swiftly and with the full force of the law to punish  fraudsters to make the CSE a place for bona fide investors; both local  and foreign.
It is noteworthy to point out that in 2005 the ADB wrote in its Sri Lanka: Financial Sector Assessment Report that “compounding of charges is only compounding the problem of insider dealing. The SEC should cease the practice of compounding charges.”
It is noteworthy to point out that in 2005 the ADB wrote in its Sri Lanka: Financial Sector Assessment Report that “compounding of charges is only compounding the problem of insider dealing. The SEC should cease the practice of compounding charges.”
 It is high time the powerful  Board of the SEC heeded this advice before the CSE loses its already  shaky credibility as a place that honest people can do business in.” 







0 Response to "SEC fine on ERI; Easy way out?"
Post a Comment